To deny this, to say that all these images are nothing more than celebrations of the female form, devoid of sexual connotation, is ludicrous. I think the word I'm looking for is... PLEASE!? Yet there are always those who will stand on what they consider "moral principle" and call me down.
I find it odd that, on the same day that one such avid detractor engaged in some... well... avid detracting, I can't find either of those collections among any of the collectors that had saved them's favorites. Over 50 of each, no longer there. One would think someone has done something to block my collections - collections which I have retitled, by the way, caving to other sensibilities - or at least it certainly seems that way.
I've yet to receive any notes from DA's powers that be. Maybe they treat collections differently. Or maybe there's a new glitch in the system that won't let you see your own collections in other peoples favorites sections. No, that's not it, because I have other collections, ones with more palatable titles (excuse the pun) that still seem to exist.
I hope it's user error, that I'm just being paranoid and incompetent in my searches. I'd hate to think that my collections have been blocked or something simply because of playful titles and over enthusiastic morality monitors.
Any thoughts?
Devious Comments
--
Just say NO to watermarks!
Read this [link] He says no to watermarks. [link]
--
Shameless Gallery Plug
--
Art, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. Just because you don't think it's art doesn't mean everyone agrees. Chances are, it's a 50/50 split at best.
--
my babu [link]
--
Art, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. Just because you don't think it's art doesn't mean everyone agrees. Chances are, it's a 50/50 split at best.
Previous PageNext Page